The input should be ONE sequence in plain text or MULTIPLE protein or peptide sequences in FASTA format
. The upper limit is set to 75,000 amino acids or 1250 peptides (max. 50 aa each) or 25 proteins (max. 3000 aa each). If the input contains at least one sequence >50 aa, the whole input is considered "protein" and 25 sequence quota is applied. Note that the limit is calculated as "lower bound" i.e. only 25 proteins are processed, even if they are (much) shorter than 3000 aa.
The input should be in single-letter amino acid code, it can be upper or lower case.
Amino acid alphabet allowed: VXCDBFMOLNYIQTGHWESKPAUR. All non-amino acid characters will be removed from the sequence.
for Ala-Pro-Lys-His-Ala-Tyr peptide, please enter APKHAY
Output & interpretation
The aim of the IPC2 is to predict isoelectric point and pKa values given the amino acid sequence. In the first panel, you obtain an interactive, virtual 2D-PAGE plot (isoelectric point vs. molecular weight). If you point a mouse on any dot you will get the fasta header of given sequence and prediction score). This is a highly useful plot if you analyze the protein lysate (it will give you a good estimate where the protein of interest should be located on the gel). Below, the plot for complete proteome (191 proteins) of Actinospica robiniae DSM 44927
Next, you get the prediction of isoelectric point for individual peptides/proteins using different models. Here, you need to know that the choice of the model also depends on the data type. There are different deep learning models trained for the peptides and proteins. Therefore, if you want to analyze peptides (e.g. before mass spec) you should take scores from IPC2.peptide. Similarly, if you are interested in proteins, use IPC2.protein model. This is because those two types of data differ significantly. In the peptides you have less charged residues thus it is easier to predict isoelectric point (additionally you do not need to consider such things as the location of the charged residue - is it on surface contributing to the molecule charge or is it inside of the protein and might the charge be "neutralized"). Here you can expect RMSE of 0.11 using IPC2.peptide model. The prediction of the isoelectric point of proteins is a completely different story. Instead of only a handful number of charged residues, you will have dozens of charged residues that can be partially hidden inside of the protein. Here, the RMSE error can be as high as 0.69.
Additionally you will get predictions of pKa values of all individual charged residues. Note, that the pKa models had been trained on the proteins, thus there are meaningless for the peptides (<50aa).
>tr|W9DVW5|W9DVW5_9ACTN Uncharacterized protein OS=Actinospica robiniae DSM 44927 GN=ActroDRAFT_0006 PE=4 SV=1
MpKa = 6.93545 T A T P RpKa = 11.99188 S RpKa = 11.99340 A EpKa = 4.12942 I V G DpKa = 3.32548 T A I A V L A A Q G A RpKa = 11.88105 G L T HpKa = 6.55317 RpKa = 11.96631 A V DpKa = 3.37898 RpKa = 11.92598 A A G L P P G S T S N HpKa = 6.54304 A RpKa = 12.01048 T RpKa = 12.00426 EpKa = 4.13095 A L L T CpKa = 8.21753 A L T RpKa = 11.98185 I T EpKa = 4.14257 L EpKa = 4.08674 A A DpKa = 3.29137 A A A A T A G Q P V F DpKa = 3.38440 T G G DpKa = 3.35726 V RpKa = 11.94923 T A L A A P I A A M L YpKa = 10.89975 RpKa = 11.99579 G L S RpKa = 11.97019 G RpKa = 12.01436 T RpKa = 12.02449 L L A RpKa = 12.01900 YpKa = 10.90900 EpKa = 4.17900 L A L EpKa = 4.07745 S T RpKa = 11.99188 RpKa = 11.97949 P A L RpKa = 11.93535 A L YpKa = 10.87718 DpKa = 3.44018 EpKa = 4.12699 A S L P F RpKa = 11.95857 G P V A A M L A A S G S A EpKa = 4.08595 P Q RpKa = 11.98567 HpKa = 6.58571 A KpKa = 10.63877 M L I A W CpKa = 8.25233 EpKa = 4.13405 G V Q F DpKa = 3.42704 A I A G A G A A T P P A EpKa = 4.07432 A EpKa = 4.15263 L RpKa = 11.96009 T G L EpKa = 4.10846 EpKa = 4.15190 L L RpKa = 11.97103 G M L G T G RpKa = 11.93990 EpKa = 4.08904 S S A I Q G V DpKa = 3.39582 RpKa = 11.43294
Moreover, at the bottom, you can get csv file with all predictions of your input ("Download results in CSV format"
button). Each line correspond to single query sequence and the columns are:
Where "pKas" dissociation constant field looks like:
which means Lys at 5th
position has pKa of 10.43, His at 19th
position has pKa of 6.54, Arg at 55th
position has pKa of 11.99 and so on.
Note, that pKa values prediction is based solely on sequence information, thus it may not be as accurate as using Rosseta pKa protocol or H++ (for benchmarks see Results
section). Yet, IPC2 provides pKa estimates in a fraction of seconds in high-throughput fashion while other methods require the structure/model of the protein and run for hours in comparison.
||Ubuntu 18.04.3 LTS